How can we use personality assessments (Kolbe A, DISC, StrengthsFinder, Culture Index) to optimally pair leaders for cross-functional projects within an EOS framework?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Optimally pairing leaders for cross-functional projects within an EOS framework by leveraging personality assessments can significantly enhance collaboration, communication, and project success. The goal is not just to find complementary strengths but also to anticipate and mitigate potential friction points.

For **Kolbe A**, look for conative diversity. A project requiring both detailed planning and quick implementation would benefit from pairing a high Fact Finder and a high Quick Start. The Fact Finder ensures thorough research and planning, while the Quick Start drives momentum and innovation. Be mindful of potential friction if both are extremely high in the same action mode without complementary support.

With **DISC**, strive for a balance of styles. A 'D' (Dominance) leader provides drive and direction, but needs an 'S' (Steadiness) or 'C' (Conscientiousness) partner to ensure follow-through, attention to detail, or team cohesion. An 'I' (Influence) leader might inspire, but could benefit from a 'C' or 'D' to keep them grounded in practicality and outcomes. The key is to cover all bases: driving results, building consensus, ensuring accuracy, and maintaining stability.

**StrengthsFinder** suggests pairing leaders whose dominant themes create synergy. For a new product development project, you might pair a leader strong in 'Ideation' and 'Strategic' thinking with another strong in 'Execution' and 'Achiever' themes. This ensures that ideas are not only generated but also brought to fruition efficiently. Avoid pairing two leaders with very similar top themes if the project demands a broad range of capabilities.

**Culture Index** offers insights into work styles. Pairing a leader with high Autonomy and low Patience for a fast-paced, independent module with a leader who has high Social Drive and high Patience for the collaborative, detailed aspects of the project can be highly effective. This ensures that different work environments and needs within the project are met with the right leadership style. Combining insights from all these assessments allows for a nuanced understanding of how leaders will naturally interact, process information, and execute tasks, leading to more robust and harmonious project leadership.