What personality assessment combinations are most effective for strengthening cross functional project leadership in an EOS environment, and how?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Strengthening cross functional project leadership within an EOS environment demands a deep understanding of how diverse personalities can either harmonize or clash when tackling shared objectives. Leveraging specific combinations of personality assessments provides a comprehensive framework for optimal pairing and collaboration. The most effective combinations typically blend assessments that measure different aspects of an individual's operational and relational dynamics.

One highly effective combination involves Kolbe A Index for conative (how we act) instincts, DISC for behavioral styles, and StrengthsFinder for natural talents. For instance, pairing a project leader high in Kolbe Quick Start (initiating action) and DISC D (driving results) with a co-leader strong in Kolbe Follow Thru (organizing and completing) and DISC C (attention to detail) creates a powerful synergy. The Quick Start/D will push for momentum and overcome obstacles, while the Follow Thru/C will ensure processes are robust and deliverables are meticulously met. StrengthsFinder adds another layer: if the Quick Start/D leader has 'Activator' and the Follow Thru/C leader has 'Focus,' their combined talents can drive a project from conception to completion with precision.

Alternatively, for projects requiring significant innovation and broad stakeholder engagement, combining Kolbe Fact Finder (gathering information) with a leader strong in StrengthsFinder's 'Ideation' and 'Relator' can be invaluable. ACDC's leader-to-leader use guides can then translate these profiles into practical strategies, outlining how these leaders should divide responsibilities, communicate updates, resolve disagreements, and leverage each other's unique contributions. This structured approach, informed by multiple assessment perspectives, significantly enhances communication, prevents common project pitfalls, and ultimately ensures more successful outcomes for cross functional initiatives across the EOS Accountability Chart.