What personality assessment combinations best support Accountability Chart innovation cycles, from ideation to implementation?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Optimizing innovation cycles within an Accountability Chart requires a deliberate blend of personality types at various stages. No single assessment provides the full picture, but strategic combinations can foster a robust innovation pipeline. For the ideation phase, a mix of Kolbe A 'Quick Starts' and StrengthsFinder's 'Ideation' or 'Strategic' themes is invaluable. Quick Starts naturally initiate and thrive on new ideas, while Ideation and Strategic thinkers generate and filter concepts. Pairing these individuals in brainstorming seats can rapidly expand the idea pool.

Moving to development and testing, DISC profiles become crucial. 'High Cs' (Conscientiousness) are excellent for scrutinizing details and ensuring quality, while 'High Is' (Influence) can champion early-stage concepts and gather feedback. Integrating these into 'Product Development' or 'R&D' seats ensures thoroughness and buy-in. For implementation, Kolbe A 'Follow Thrus' and StrengthsFinder 'Achiever' or 'Discipline' themes are essential. These individuals are adept at bringing ideas to fruition and managing projects to completion. The 'Execution' or 'Operations' seats on the Accountability Chart benefit immensely from these profiles. Finally, a Culture Index assessment can ensure that the individuals driving innovation are culturally aligned, promoting a harmonious environment that supports risk-taking and learning from failure. By consciously pairing these diverse strengths, organizations can create a dynamic innovation engine within their Accountability Chart, guided by tailored leader-to-leader use guides.